April 16, 2019

Supported News: Call for Paper – Partnerships of economic powers in Asia-Pacific

CALL FOR PAPERS Partnerships of economic powers in Asia-Pacific  

Ho Chi Minh Colloquium, Ho Chi Minh University of Law: 25-26 November 2019
Chiang Mai Colloquium, Chiang Mai University: 28-29 November 2019 

Under the aegis of The French and Japanese Legal Network of Tours (Nihon-Europa) and the multidisciplinary Network "Nouvelles Dynamiques Partenariales Externes de l'UE en Asie-Pacifique" (NODYPEX) of Rennes. This event is a continuation of the déjà̀ actions undertaken by the two networks, in Hanoi, Tours and Rennes. 
The European Union has concluded or will conclude several political and economic partnership agreements with Asia-Pacific countries (Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia, Vietnam, South Korea, Japan, Australia, New Zealand, Chile, Mexico). Political or strategic partnership agreements have already been signed with all these countries except Mexico and Chile, which are contracting parties to a single agreement, and economic partnership agreements have been finalized with South Korea, Canada, Japan, Singapore and Vietnam. 
This dense network of agreements, constituting the EU-Asia-Pacific pole, cannot be understood without coordination with the many agreements concluded or to be concluded between the various partners in the same region, and first of all the agreements concluded between the ASEAN countries and between ASEAN and its third partners in the area. 
In parallel with the EU-Asia-Pacific and ASEAN poles, a third pole is emerging, which is divided into three overlapping groups: one group, led by Japan and Canada, with the Global and Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (PTCFP), another group led by China, with the Global Regional Economic Partnership Agreement (RCEP) and a group around the United States, with the recent US-Canada-Mexico Agreement (EUCM), and the South KoreanAmerican Free Trade Agreement (KORUS).  
The whole problem is to know how these different poles, in constitution, which group together more than 80% of the world economy, are organized. More specifically, are the EuroAsian agreements as well as those with the American Pacific countries (AACC with Canada, revised global agreement with Mexico, future revised association agreement with Chile) built according to the same model as those of other regional partnerships of the EU and third countries? Do they have a specificity in terms of their content? How are these partnerships organised in the form of "Olympic rings", given that the European Union and several AsiaPacific States are located in several rings at the same time? 
The distribution of the themes envisaged in the two conferences is more in line with organisational needs than with legal coherence. 

Draft programme of the Ho Chi Minh Colloquium, Ho Chi Minh University of Law: 25-26 November 2019 

More specifically, in terms of architecture, do the EU-Asia-Pacific agreements demonstrate originality with their system of plural agreements, namely a partnership and cooperation agreement (PCA) or a strategic partnership agreement (SPA) and a free trade agreement (FTA) and an agreement on investment protection in relation to the construction of other agreements that may be developed under different rules? What are the convergences between the rights recognized in the various agreements and how are they transcribed into national laws? 
Axis 1 :  Comparative study of the architecture of partnership agreements: EU-Asia-Pacific, ASEAN, EUCM, KORUS, Global and Progressive Transpacific Partnership (PPTPP) 

As an example: 

Differentiated commitments of partners in partnership agreements ? comparative between EU agreements, PTCBS and EUCM

Binding and non-binding provisions in these agreements

Legal effects of these agreements (direct applicability or not)? 

Axis 2 : Comparative study of the content of certain partnership agreements and their implementation 
Sub-axis1 :  Comparative study of some of the contents of the partnership agreements: EU-Asia-Pacific, ASEAN, EUCM, KORUS, Global and Progressive Transpacific Partnership    
As an example: 

The abolition of almost all customs duties with the delicate issue of "rules of origin".

The reduction of non-tariff barriers.

Recognition of geographical indications.

Liberalization of services.

The opening up of public procurement.

Consideration of intellectual property. 

Sub-axis 2 : Comparative study of the procedures for transposing the provisions of partnership agreements into national law 

 As an example: 

Compensation law.

Commercial diversion.

Sustainable development. 

Draft programme of the Chiang Mai symposium, Chiang Mai University:  28-29 November 2019

What is the strategy of the main protagonists according to their participation in the agreements of different poles? What are the convergences and normative divergences between the different partnerships? 
Axis 1 :  Strategy of the main partners, according to their participation within each cluster 

US strategy, in the context of the EUCM, the Korus and the possible free trade agreement on industrial goods with the EU.

Japan's strategy in the context of its partnerships with the EU, ASEAN, and the TransPacific Global and Progressive Partnership (CPTPP).

Canada's strategy in its partnership with the EU, through the EUCM and PWFC.

Strategy of ASEAN and its member countries towards EU-Asia-Pacific partnerships and the CPTTP.

The positioning of ASEAN and its member states towards American unilateralism and American-Chinese trade confrontation.

Comparison between the EU's partnership with Asia-Pacific and North African countries (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA) with Morocco and Tunisia).

China's strategy under its initiative on the new silk routes (The Belt and the Road Initiative -BRI). 

Axis 2 :  Normative convergences and divergences between the different partnerships: EU-AsiaPacific, ASEAN, EUCM, KORUS, Global and Progressive Transpacific Partnership (PPTPP) 
As an example:

The different conceptions of the notion of "market economy" (EU/US/China) and their implications for partnerships Regulatory cooperation and convergence of regulatory practices in AACC, EUCM and PWFC.

Investment protection and investor-state dispute settlement.

Taking into account sustainable development and climate change.

The energy transition

Dialogue with civil society 

Document Download Here: Link

More News

See all

March 23, 2023

[CORPORATE] Earn double Miles when you fly with Air France or KLM

Read more

March 20, 2023

EuroCham’s Highlights in 2022

Read more

March 20, 2023

[AGM 2023] Meet EuroCham’s 2023 Board of Directors

Read more

March 05, 2023

EuroCham Shared Our Views on Boosting Vietnam’s Business and Tourism on VTV4

Read more

March 02, 2023

Vietnam Business Forum (VBF) 2023 Scheduled for March 17, 19 – Register Now!

Read more

March 02, 2023

Food, Agri and Aqua Business Sector Committee (FAABS) Elected its 2023 Board

Read more

February 27, 2023

[CORPORATE]Vietjet opens new flight routes Ho Chi Minh City – Sydney; Ho Chi Minh City – Melbourne only 0VND

Read more

February 23, 2023

EuroCham and HAWA Sign MOU at HawaExpo 2023 to Boost Industry Cooperation and Trade Activities

Read more

February 22, 2023

[Work @ EuroCham] Sector Committee Coordinator

Read more

February 22, 2023

EuroCham Spoke at a Meeting Between HCMC’s Leaders and Foreign Business Associations

Read more

February 21, 2023

[CORPORATE] Discover the EIS Educational Village – Open Day 25th March 2023

Read more

February 21, 2023

[CORPORATE] EMS Vietnam – Vietnam Post’s High quality International Express Service

Read more

February 21, 2023

EuroCham Vietnam and DOLISA Met to Discuss Work Permit Process Difficulties in HCMC

Read more

February 20, 2023

Vice-Chair Claudia Anselmi Shared Perspectives at Human Rights Due Diligence (HRDD) Forum

Read more

February 13, 2023

[Work @ EuroCham] Head of Office Hanoi cum External Relations Manager

Read more

February 09, 2023

EuroCham Will Unveil Our 2022/2023 Whitebook and GEFE 2022 Report on Feb. 16

Read more

February 06, 2023

Chairman Alain Cany Sat Down for an Interview with Forbes Vietnam

Read more

January 30, 2023

Deutsches Haus Ho Chi Minh City Ushered in the New Year with a Lion Dance

Read more

January 19, 2023

The European Business Organization Worldwide Network’s (EBO WWN) Southeast Asian Network Kicked Off Its First Meeting of 2023

Read more

January 16, 2023

Q4 2022 Business Climate Index Results Released

Read more

October 05, 2022

EuroCham’s GEFE 2022 Press Conference in Hanoi

Read more

September 20, 2022

EuroCham Met with Prime Minister Pham Minh Chinh three times last week

Read more

August 24, 2022

EuroCham and its Nine Affiliated European BAs Held the “GEFE and You – How You Can Get Involved” Webinar

Read more

August 17, 2022

Restricted content

Read more

August 11, 2022

[Corporate] EMS International Services to Japan, Korea, Taiwan with extremely preferential rates in July and August 2022

Read more

August 05, 2022

EuroCham attended program on “Connecting the suppliers in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam with distributors, exporting businesses and trade promotion organizations”

Read more

August 01, 2022

EuroCham attended the Workshop "Evaluation Framework for Business regulation reforms and Data Analysis solutions"

Read more

July 28, 2022

[Corporate] BASF Q2 2022: BASF again with strong earnings despite continued high prices for raw materials and energy

Read more

July 08, 2022

Digital Sector Committee – Newsletter Issue No.3 / 2022

Read more

July 01, 2022

[BCI Q2 2022] European Business Stakeholders’ Confidence in Vietnam’s Business Environment Declined Slightly Following Global Economic Uncertainty

Read more

Pour une expérience optimale, veuillez tenir votre mobile à la verticale !

Platinum Partners

Gold Premium Partners

Gold Partners

Silver Partners

Premium Service Partners